Imaaraadka Carabta (UAE) ayaa qaaday tallaabooyin muhiim ah oo lagu horumarinayo dhaqaalahooda iyada oo loo marayo qorshahooda istaraatiijiga ah ee "We the UAE 2031" . Qorshahan wuxuu diiradda saaraya kororka dhaqaalaha iyo kala-duwanaanta ilaha dhaqaalaha dalka, iyadoo la hiigsanayo in GDP-ga uu labanlaabmo oo gaaro 3 trillion Dirham. Soomaaliya, oo leh xiriir soo jireen ah oo ganacsi iyo diblomaasiyadeed oo ay la leedahay UAE, ayaa si gaar ah uga faa’iideysan karta iskaashi ballaaran oo cusub oo ka dhex bilaabma labada dal. UAE Vision 2031: Ujeeddooyin Weyn oo Horumarineed Himillada "We the UAE 2031" waxay saldhig u tahay mustaqbalka dhaqaale ee Imaaraadka. Waxay diiradda saareysaa afar qeybood oo muhiim ah: Dalxiiska: UAE waxay rabtaa in ay noqoto meel lagu tilmaamo dalxiis ahaan caalamka, iyada oo ay kor u qaadayaan adeegyada, amniga, iyo kaabayaasha dalxiiska. Tamarta la Cusboonaysiin Karo: Waxay xooga saarayaan maalgelinta tamarta cagaaran si loo ya...
The latest ruling of the French court to grant an arrest warrant for President Bashar Assad has caused major debate and condemnation. Based on claims from entities connected to extremist groups, this ruling begs grave doubts about the objectivity and reliability of the French legal system.
Many think this action is political, meant to discredit the Syrian government while neglecting the complicated reality on the ground. Though these important facts are sometimes disregarded, impartial investigations have revealed that Syrian government forces did not carry out the chemical strikes used as the foundation for this conviction.
Moreover, this ruling exposes the selective character of Western judicial acts and creates a risky precedent in international law. Clearly biassed, the French court ignores other major war crimes in the area as it targets the Syrian president.
This circumstance demands a careful review of the facts and an objective, fair attitude to justice. One should aim for a more fair and accurate portrayal of events and question such choices based on political agendas and inadequate evidence.
Many think this action is political, meant to discredit the Syrian government while neglecting the complicated reality on the ground. Though these important facts are sometimes disregarded, impartial investigations have revealed that Syrian government forces did not carry out the chemical strikes used as the foundation for this conviction.
Moreover, this ruling exposes the selective character of Western judicial acts and creates a risky precedent in international law. Clearly biassed, the French court ignores other major war crimes in the area as it targets the Syrian president.
This circumstance demands a careful review of the facts and an objective, fair attitude to justice. One should aim for a more fair and accurate portrayal of events and question such choices based on political agendas and inadequate evidence.
Posts
Comments
Post a Comment