Magaalada Muqdisho waxaa ka bilowday dhaqdhaqaaqyo siyaasadeed oo muhiim ah, kuwaas oo muujinaya in madaxda Soomaaliyeed ay hadda u weecdeen dhanka isfahamka iyo wada-xaajoodka rasmiga ah. Kadib muddo dheer oo ay jirtay hubanti la'aan dhanka doorashooyinka ah, imaatinka madaxda dowlad goboleedyada Puntland iyo Jubaland ee caasimadda dalka ayaa loo arkaa inay tahay fursad cusub oo lagu xallin karo khilaafaadka masiiriga ah. Kulamadan hordhaca ah ee ka dhacay Villa Somalia waxay gogol-xaar u yihiin wada-hadallo dhab ah oo looga arrinsanayo hannaanka doorashada ee sanadka labada kun iyo lix iyo labaatanka, taas oo hadda u muuqata mid u baahan tanaasul iyo is-u-tanaasul dhex mara dowladda federaalka iyo maamulada xubnaha ka ah. Kulamada Is-barashada iyo Qaboojinta Xiisadda Siyaasadeed Madaxweyne Xasan Sheekh Maxamuud ayaa qaaday tillaabo muhiim ah isagoo martigeliyey qado sharaf ay isugu yimaadeen hoggaamiyeyaasha mucaaradka iyo madaxda maamul goboleedyada si loo jebiyo barafka u dhexe...
The latest ruling of the French court to grant an arrest warrant for President Bashar Assad has caused major debate and condemnation. Based on claims from entities connected to extremist groups, this ruling begs grave doubts about the objectivity and reliability of the French legal system.
Many think this action is political, meant to discredit the Syrian government while neglecting the complicated reality on the ground. Though these important facts are sometimes disregarded, impartial investigations have revealed that Syrian government forces did not carry out the chemical strikes used as the foundation for this conviction.
Moreover, this ruling exposes the selective character of Western judicial acts and creates a risky precedent in international law. Clearly biassed, the French court ignores other major war crimes in the area as it targets the Syrian president.
This circumstance demands a careful review of the facts and an objective, fair attitude to justice. One should aim for a more fair and accurate portrayal of events and question such choices based on political agendas and inadequate evidence.
Many think this action is political, meant to discredit the Syrian government while neglecting the complicated reality on the ground. Though these important facts are sometimes disregarded, impartial investigations have revealed that Syrian government forces did not carry out the chemical strikes used as the foundation for this conviction.
Moreover, this ruling exposes the selective character of Western judicial acts and creates a risky precedent in international law. Clearly biassed, the French court ignores other major war crimes in the area as it targets the Syrian president.
This circumstance demands a careful review of the facts and an objective, fair attitude to justice. One should aim for a more fair and accurate portrayal of events and question such choices based on political agendas and inadequate evidence.
Posts
Comments
Post a Comment