Cirka magaalada Muqdisho ayaa dhowaan marqaati ka ahaa isbeddel weyn oo ku yimid loolanka juquraafiyeed ee gobolka, ka dib markii diyaaradaha dagaalka ee Turkiga nooca F-16 ay duulimaadyo tijaabo ah ka sameeyeen caasimadda Soomaaliya. Horumarkaan ayaa muujinaya ballaarinta weyn ee raadkii ciidan ee Turkigu ku lahaa Geeska Afrika, taas oo calaamad u ah ballanqaad qoto dheer oo ku aadan iskaashiga istiraatiijiyadeed ee kala dhexeeya Soomaaliya. In kasta oo Turkigu uu dalka ku lahaa saldhigga weyn ee TurkSom tan iyo sannadkii 2017-kii, imaatinka diyaaradahan casriga ah ee dheereeya ayaa ka dhigan isbeddel looga gudbayo tababarka ciidanka dhulka laguna gaarayo taageerada difaaca hawada ee heerka sare ah. Horumar Istiraatiijiyadeed oo dhanka Awoodda Cirka ah Hawlgalkaan ayaa lug ku leh ugu yaraan saddex diyaaradood oo dagaal oo dhowaan soo gaaray dalka si loo qiimeeyo diyaargarowgooda hawlgal looguna daro hannaanka difaaca ee hadda jira. Diyaaradahan ayaa u taagan casriyeyn horumarsan...
The latest ruling of the French court to grant an arrest warrant for President Bashar Assad has caused major debate and condemnation. Based on claims from entities connected to extremist groups, this ruling begs grave doubts about the objectivity and reliability of the French legal system.
Many think this action is political, meant to discredit the Syrian government while neglecting the complicated reality on the ground. Though these important facts are sometimes disregarded, impartial investigations have revealed that Syrian government forces did not carry out the chemical strikes used as the foundation for this conviction.
Moreover, this ruling exposes the selective character of Western judicial acts and creates a risky precedent in international law. Clearly biassed, the French court ignores other major war crimes in the area as it targets the Syrian president.
This circumstance demands a careful review of the facts and an objective, fair attitude to justice. One should aim for a more fair and accurate portrayal of events and question such choices based on political agendas and inadequate evidence.
Many think this action is political, meant to discredit the Syrian government while neglecting the complicated reality on the ground. Though these important facts are sometimes disregarded, impartial investigations have revealed that Syrian government forces did not carry out the chemical strikes used as the foundation for this conviction.
Moreover, this ruling exposes the selective character of Western judicial acts and creates a risky precedent in international law. Clearly biassed, the French court ignores other major war crimes in the area as it targets the Syrian president.
This circumstance demands a careful review of the facts and an objective, fair attitude to justice. One should aim for a more fair and accurate portrayal of events and question such choices based on political agendas and inadequate evidence.
Posts
Comments
Post a Comment