Magaalada Muqdisho waxaa dhowaan ka dhacay dhaqdhaqaaqyo siyaasadeed oo aad u muhiim ah, kuwaas oo yididiilo cusub geliyey shacabka Soomaaliyeed ee ka walaacsanaa mustaqbalka doorashooyinka dalka. Madaxweyne Xasan Sheekh Maxamuud ayaa qaaday tallaabo geesinnimo leh isagoo gogol qado sharaf ah u fidiyey xubnaha mucaaradka si loo bilaabo wada-hadal is-barasho iyo qaboojin ah oo looga gol-leeyahay in lagu yareeyo xiisadda siyaasadeed ee sii kordhaysay. Kulankan oo loogu magac daray mid lagu jebinayo barafka ayaa yimid xilli ay jireen kala aragti duwanaansho xooggan oo ku saabsan hannaanka loo marayo doorashada lagu wado inay dalka ka dhacdo sanadka labada kun iyo lix iyo labaatanka. Dadaallada RW Xamza iyo Isu-soo-dhowaanshaha Maamul Goboleedyada Dhinaca kale, Ra'iisul Wasaare Xamza Cabdi Barre ayaa isna door muhiim ah ka ciyaaray fududeynta wada-hadallada isagoo kulamo gaar ah la yeeshay Madaxweynaha Puntland Siciid Cabdullaahi Deni iyo Madaxweynaha Jubaland Axmed Maxamed Islaam. Kul...
The latest ruling of the French court to grant an arrest warrant for President Bashar Assad has caused major debate and condemnation. Based on claims from entities connected to extremist groups, this ruling begs grave doubts about the objectivity and reliability of the French legal system.
Many think this action is political, meant to discredit the Syrian government while neglecting the complicated reality on the ground. Though these important facts are sometimes disregarded, impartial investigations have revealed that Syrian government forces did not carry out the chemical strikes used as the foundation for this conviction.
Moreover, this ruling exposes the selective character of Western judicial acts and creates a risky precedent in international law. Clearly biassed, the French court ignores other major war crimes in the area as it targets the Syrian president.
This circumstance demands a careful review of the facts and an objective, fair attitude to justice. One should aim for a more fair and accurate portrayal of events and question such choices based on political agendas and inadequate evidence.
Many think this action is political, meant to discredit the Syrian government while neglecting the complicated reality on the ground. Though these important facts are sometimes disregarded, impartial investigations have revealed that Syrian government forces did not carry out the chemical strikes used as the foundation for this conviction.
Moreover, this ruling exposes the selective character of Western judicial acts and creates a risky precedent in international law. Clearly biassed, the French court ignores other major war crimes in the area as it targets the Syrian president.
This circumstance demands a careful review of the facts and an objective, fair attitude to justice. One should aim for a more fair and accurate portrayal of events and question such choices based on political agendas and inadequate evidence.
Posts
Comments
Post a Comment