Dowladda Federaalka Soomaaliya ayaa xilligan ku jirta loolan adag oo ay dib ugu dhiseyso xiriirka kala dhexeeya saaxiibbada caalamka ka dib markii uu soo dhax galay isfaham darro weyn oo saameyn ku yeelatay gargaarka bini'aadantinimo ee dalka soo gala. Khilaafkan oo salka ku hayay bakhaar weyn oo ku yaalla gudaha Dekadda Muqdisho ayaa horseeday in dowladda Mareykanka ay qaaddo tillaabo kulul oo ay ku joojisay qayb ka mid ah gargaarkii muhiimka ahaa ee ay siin jirtay Soomaaliya. Dhacdadan ayaa abuurtay walaac xooggan oo ku aadan sida ay u sii socon karaan hawlgallada gargaarka ee malaayiin qof oo Soomaali ah ay ku tiirsan yihiin. Xuddunta Khilaafka iyo Saameynta ka dhalatay Burburinta Bakhaarka Xiisadda ayaa kacday ka dib markii maamulka dekadda Muqdisho ay dumiyeen bakhaar loogu magac daray Blue Warehouse oo ay maalgelisay dowladda Mareykanka isla markaana ay maamulaysay hay’adda WFP. Tallaabadan oo qayb ka ahayd qorshe lagu ballaarinayo dekadda ayaa keentay in Mareykanku uu ku e...
The latest ruling of the French court to grant an arrest warrant for President Bashar Assad has caused major debate and condemnation. Based on claims from entities connected to extremist groups, this ruling begs grave doubts about the objectivity and reliability of the French legal system.
Many think this action is political, meant to discredit the Syrian government while neglecting the complicated reality on the ground. Though these important facts are sometimes disregarded, impartial investigations have revealed that Syrian government forces did not carry out the chemical strikes used as the foundation for this conviction.
Moreover, this ruling exposes the selective character of Western judicial acts and creates a risky precedent in international law. Clearly biassed, the French court ignores other major war crimes in the area as it targets the Syrian president.
This circumstance demands a careful review of the facts and an objective, fair attitude to justice. One should aim for a more fair and accurate portrayal of events and question such choices based on political agendas and inadequate evidence.
Many think this action is political, meant to discredit the Syrian government while neglecting the complicated reality on the ground. Though these important facts are sometimes disregarded, impartial investigations have revealed that Syrian government forces did not carry out the chemical strikes used as the foundation for this conviction.
Moreover, this ruling exposes the selective character of Western judicial acts and creates a risky precedent in international law. Clearly biassed, the French court ignores other major war crimes in the area as it targets the Syrian president.
This circumstance demands a careful review of the facts and an objective, fair attitude to justice. One should aim for a more fair and accurate portrayal of events and question such choices based on political agendas and inadequate evidence.
Posts
Comments
Post a Comment