Madaxweynaha Jamhuuriyadda Federaalka Soomaaliya, Mudane Xasan Sheekh Maxamuud, ayaa xarunta madaxtooyada ku qaabilay wefdi heer sare ah oo ka socday dowladda Boqortooyada Midowday ee Britain. Wefdigan waxaa hoggaaminaysay Wasiiru-dawlaha horumarinta iyo arrimaha Afrika ee UK, Jenny Chapman, iyadoo ujeedka kulankoodu ahaa mid salka ku haya xoojinta xiriirka faca weyn ee ka dhexeeya labada dal iyo sidii kor loogu qaadi lahaa iskaashiga dhinacyada badan leh ee ka socda guud ahaan gobolka Geeska Afrika. Taageerada Britain ee Xasiloonida iyo Horumarka Soomaaliya Intii uu kulanku socday, Jenny Chapman waxay si cad u xaqiijisay in dowladda Britain ay ka go’an tahay inay garab istaagto madaxtooyada Soomaaliya iyo qorshayaasha lagu xasilinayo dalka. Britain ayaa u aragta in Soomaaliya oo nabad ah ay tahay laf-dhabarta amniga ee qaaradda Afrika iyo marinada muhiimka ah ee badda, waxayna wasiiradu xustay in horumarka laga gaaray dhinaca dowlad dhiska iyo la dagaallanka argagixisada uu yahay...
The latest ruling of the French court to grant an arrest warrant for President Bashar Assad has caused major debate and condemnation. Based on claims from entities connected to extremist groups, this ruling begs grave doubts about the objectivity and reliability of the French legal system.
Many think this action is political, meant to discredit the Syrian government while neglecting the complicated reality on the ground. Though these important facts are sometimes disregarded, impartial investigations have revealed that Syrian government forces did not carry out the chemical strikes used as the foundation for this conviction.
Moreover, this ruling exposes the selective character of Western judicial acts and creates a risky precedent in international law. Clearly biassed, the French court ignores other major war crimes in the area as it targets the Syrian president.
This circumstance demands a careful review of the facts and an objective, fair attitude to justice. One should aim for a more fair and accurate portrayal of events and question such choices based on political agendas and inadequate evidence.
Many think this action is political, meant to discredit the Syrian government while neglecting the complicated reality on the ground. Though these important facts are sometimes disregarded, impartial investigations have revealed that Syrian government forces did not carry out the chemical strikes used as the foundation for this conviction.
Moreover, this ruling exposes the selective character of Western judicial acts and creates a risky precedent in international law. Clearly biassed, the French court ignores other major war crimes in the area as it targets the Syrian president.
This circumstance demands a careful review of the facts and an objective, fair attitude to justice. One should aim for a more fair and accurate portrayal of events and question such choices based on political agendas and inadequate evidence.
Posts
Comments
Post a Comment