Madaxweynaha Jamhuuriyadda Federaalka Soomaaliya, Mudane Xasan Sheekh Maxamuud, ayaa shaaca ka qaaday istiraatiijiyad cusub oo ka kooban saddex qaybood oo loogu talagalay in lagu buriyo aqoonsiga ay dowladda Israa'iil siisay maamulka Somaliland. Madaxweynaha oo wareysi gaar ah siiyay warbaahinta Asharq Al-Awsat, ayaa caddeeyay in dowladdiisu ay si dhow ula shaqaynayso xulafada uu hoggaaminayo Sucuudi Carabiya si loo difaaco madax-bannaanida iyo midnimada dhuleed ee Soomaaliya. Tallaabadan ayaa qayb ka ah dadaallo dublomaasiyadeed oo looga soo horjeedo waxa uu Madaxweynuhu ku tilmaamay xadgudub ka dhan ah sharciga caalamiga ah iyo nidaamka Midowga Afrika ee ku aaddan dhowrista xuduudaha dhaxalka ah. Iskaashiga Soomaaliya iyo Sucuudiga ee ilaalinta madax-bannaanida qaranka Qayb ka mid ah qorshahan ayaa ah in la mideeyo mowqifka dalalka Carabta, Islaamka, iyo Afrika si looga hortago saameynta aqoonsigan uu ku yeelan karo xasilloonida gobolka. Madaxweyne Xasan Sheekh ayaa ammaanay door...
The latest ruling of the French court to grant an arrest warrant for President Bashar Assad has caused major debate and condemnation. Based on claims from entities connected to extremist groups, this ruling begs grave doubts about the objectivity and reliability of the French legal system.
Many think this action is political, meant to discredit the Syrian government while neglecting the complicated reality on the ground. Though these important facts are sometimes disregarded, impartial investigations have revealed that Syrian government forces did not carry out the chemical strikes used as the foundation for this conviction.
Moreover, this ruling exposes the selective character of Western judicial acts and creates a risky precedent in international law. Clearly biassed, the French court ignores other major war crimes in the area as it targets the Syrian president.
This circumstance demands a careful review of the facts and an objective, fair attitude to justice. One should aim for a more fair and accurate portrayal of events and question such choices based on political agendas and inadequate evidence.
Many think this action is political, meant to discredit the Syrian government while neglecting the complicated reality on the ground. Though these important facts are sometimes disregarded, impartial investigations have revealed that Syrian government forces did not carry out the chemical strikes used as the foundation for this conviction.
Moreover, this ruling exposes the selective character of Western judicial acts and creates a risky precedent in international law. Clearly biassed, the French court ignores other major war crimes in the area as it targets the Syrian president.
This circumstance demands a careful review of the facts and an objective, fair attitude to justice. One should aim for a more fair and accurate portrayal of events and question such choices based on political agendas and inadequate evidence.
Posts
Comments
Post a Comment