Madaxweynaha Maraykanka Donald Trump ayaa qaaday tallaabo dibloomaasiyadeed oo muhiim ah isagoo martigeliyey kulankii ugu horreeyay ee Guddiga Nabadda (Board of Peace) si looga wada hadlo xaaladda ka taagan Marinka Qasa. Kulankan oo ka dhacay Aqalka Cad ayaa calaamad u ah bilowga qorshe cusub oo maamulka Trump uu rabo inuu ku soo afjaro colaadda mudada dheer ka socotay bariga dhexe, gaar ahaan dagaalka u dhexeeya Israa'iil iyo Xamaas. Madaxweynuhu wuxuu muujiyey inuu ka go’an yahay in la helo xal waara oo horseeda nabad iyo xasillooni ka dhalata gobolka, isagoo xoogga saaraya in loo baahan yahay isbeddel dhab ah oo laga dhex sifeeyo hannaankii hore ee dublamaasiyadda. Kulamada Hordhaca ah iyo Istaraatiijiyadda Cusub ee Nabadda Guddigan nabadda ee uu dhisay Madaxweyne Trump ayaa isugu jira khubaro dhanka amniga ah, dublamaasiyiin rug-caddaa ah iyo taliyeyaal hore, kuwaas oo loo xilsaaray inay dejiyaan khariidad cad oo loo maro xabbad-joojin rasmi ah iyo dib u dhiska deegaannada ku ...
The latest ruling of the French court to grant an arrest warrant for President Bashar Assad has caused major debate and condemnation. Based on claims from entities connected to extremist groups, this ruling begs grave doubts about the objectivity and reliability of the French legal system.
Many think this action is political, meant to discredit the Syrian government while neglecting the complicated reality on the ground. Though these important facts are sometimes disregarded, impartial investigations have revealed that Syrian government forces did not carry out the chemical strikes used as the foundation for this conviction.
Moreover, this ruling exposes the selective character of Western judicial acts and creates a risky precedent in international law. Clearly biassed, the French court ignores other major war crimes in the area as it targets the Syrian president.
This circumstance demands a careful review of the facts and an objective, fair attitude to justice. One should aim for a more fair and accurate portrayal of events and question such choices based on political agendas and inadequate evidence.
Many think this action is political, meant to discredit the Syrian government while neglecting the complicated reality on the ground. Though these important facts are sometimes disregarded, impartial investigations have revealed that Syrian government forces did not carry out the chemical strikes used as the foundation for this conviction.
Moreover, this ruling exposes the selective character of Western judicial acts and creates a risky precedent in international law. Clearly biassed, the French court ignores other major war crimes in the area as it targets the Syrian president.
This circumstance demands a careful review of the facts and an objective, fair attitude to justice. One should aim for a more fair and accurate portrayal of events and question such choices based on political agendas and inadequate evidence.
Posts
Comments
Post a Comment