Muddooyinkii u dambeeyey waxaa dalka gudihiisa iyo dibaddiisaba si weyn looga dareemayay guux iyo dhaleecayn xooggan oo loo jeedinayo qaabka uu Madaxweynaha Soomaaliya u maamulo arrimaha qaranka. Dadka u dhuun-daloola siyaasadda iyo hoggaamiyeyaasha mucaaradka ayaa rumeysan in hannaanka hadda jira uu u muuqdo mid ka fog wada-tashigii iyo dhegeysiga talada dadweynaha ee looga bartay nidaamka dimuqraadiyadda ee curdinka ah. Dhaleecayntan ayaa salka ku haysa walaaca laga qabo in awoodda dawladdu ay ku ururto gacmo kooban, taas oo loo arko inay caqabad ku tahay geeddi-socodka dhismaha hay'adaha qaranka iyo xasiloonida siyaasadeed ee dalka. Walaaca laga qabo Madax-bannaanida Hay’adaha iyo Maamul-wanaagga Qodobada ugu muhiimsan ee maqaallada lagu qoray Garowe Online iyo falanqeeyeyaasha kale ay diiradda saarayaan waxaa ka mid ah saameynta hoggaanka Madaxweynuhu uu ku leeyahay madax-bannaanida hay'adaha sharciga iyo fulinta. Waxaa jira eedaymo sheegaya in go’aannada masiiriga ah ee ...
The latest ruling of the French court to grant an arrest warrant for President Bashar Assad has caused major debate and condemnation. Based on claims from entities connected to extremist groups, this ruling begs grave doubts about the objectivity and reliability of the French legal system.
Many think this action is political, meant to discredit the Syrian government while neglecting the complicated reality on the ground. Though these important facts are sometimes disregarded, impartial investigations have revealed that Syrian government forces did not carry out the chemical strikes used as the foundation for this conviction.
Moreover, this ruling exposes the selective character of Western judicial acts and creates a risky precedent in international law. Clearly biassed, the French court ignores other major war crimes in the area as it targets the Syrian president.
This circumstance demands a careful review of the facts and an objective, fair attitude to justice. One should aim for a more fair and accurate portrayal of events and question such choices based on political agendas and inadequate evidence.
Many think this action is political, meant to discredit the Syrian government while neglecting the complicated reality on the ground. Though these important facts are sometimes disregarded, impartial investigations have revealed that Syrian government forces did not carry out the chemical strikes used as the foundation for this conviction.
Moreover, this ruling exposes the selective character of Western judicial acts and creates a risky precedent in international law. Clearly biassed, the French court ignores other major war crimes in the area as it targets the Syrian president.
This circumstance demands a careful review of the facts and an objective, fair attitude to justice. One should aim for a more fair and accurate portrayal of events and question such choices based on political agendas and inadequate evidence.
Posts
Comments
Post a Comment