Shan Xildhibaan oo Asal ahaan Soomaali ah oo loo Doortay Baarlamaanka Sweden Shan siyaasi oo asal ahaan Soomaali ah ayaa ku guuleystay kuraas ka tirsan Baarlamaanka Sweden, Riksdag, kaddib doorashadii guud ee dalka ee 2026, sida lagu sheegay liiska rasmiga ah ee xildhibaanada la doortay ee Baarlamaanka Sweden. Akhri warbixinta Dawan Africa . Shanta xildhibaan waxay ka tirsan yihiin Xisbiga Cagaaran iyo Xisbiga Bidixda, waxaana laga soo doortay afar deegaan doorasho oo kala ah Degmada Gothenburg, Degmada Stockholm, Gobolka Södermanland iyo Gobolka Dalarna. Ka eeg liiska rasmiga ah ee Baarlamaanka Sweden . Leila Ali Elmi oo Xisbiga Cagaaran uga soo baxday Gothenburg ayaa ah qofka kaliya ee shanta xildhibaan ka mid ah ee horey uga tirsanaa Baarlamaanka. Waxay markii ugu horreysay baarlamaanka gashay 2018, waxaana dib loo doortay 2022 iyo mar kale 2026. Akhri faahfaahinta doorashada . Ilyas Hassan ayaa Xisbiga Bidixda uga soo baxay Degmada Stockholm, waxaana uu ka mid noqon doonaa Ba...
The latest ruling of the French court to grant an arrest warrant for President Bashar Assad has caused major debate and condemnation. Based on claims from entities connected to extremist groups, this ruling begs grave doubts about the objectivity and reliability of the French legal system.
Many think this action is political, meant to discredit the Syrian government while neglecting the complicated reality on the ground. Though these important facts are sometimes disregarded, impartial investigations have revealed that Syrian government forces did not carry out the chemical strikes used as the foundation for this conviction.
Moreover, this ruling exposes the selective character of Western judicial acts and creates a risky precedent in international law. Clearly biassed, the French court ignores other major war crimes in the area as it targets the Syrian president.
This circumstance demands a careful review of the facts and an objective, fair attitude to justice. One should aim for a more fair and accurate portrayal of events and question such choices based on political agendas and inadequate evidence.
Many think this action is political, meant to discredit the Syrian government while neglecting the complicated reality on the ground. Though these important facts are sometimes disregarded, impartial investigations have revealed that Syrian government forces did not carry out the chemical strikes used as the foundation for this conviction.
Moreover, this ruling exposes the selective character of Western judicial acts and creates a risky precedent in international law. Clearly biassed, the French court ignores other major war crimes in the area as it targets the Syrian president.
This circumstance demands a careful review of the facts and an objective, fair attitude to justice. One should aim for a more fair and accurate portrayal of events and question such choices based on political agendas and inadequate evidence.
Posts
Comments
Post a Comment