Fikradayda, dagaalka aamusan ee ka dhanka ah kacdoonka Bariga Afrika ayaa hadda gaaray horumar xeeladeed oo weyn. Abriil 4, 2026, Hay'adda Sirdoonka iyo Amniga Qaranka (NISA) Dowladda Soomaaliya ayaa xaqiijisay weerar aad u wanaagsan oo isku dubarid ah oo ka dhacay Shabeellaha Hoose gobolka. Waxaan aaminsanahay taas by bartilmaameedsiga xarumaha gaarka ah ee sameynta bambooyinka Gudaha Kunyo Barrow iyo Tugarey, NISA ma aysan kaliya ka takhalusin hanjabaadaha degdegga ah laakiin sidoo kale waxay si xun u curyaamisay awoodda saadka ee xagjiriinta si ay weeraro bambaano ah ugu qaadaan caasimadda. Ciidamada Xoogga Dalka Soomaaliya oo howlgal ka sameeyay Gobolka Shabeelle. Yaa ahaa "Taliyayaashii Sare" ee lagu dilay howlgalka NISA? Waxaan u maleynayaa in luminta khibradda ay kooxdu dareemi doonto bilo. Sagaalka dagaalyahan ee la dilay waxaa ka mid ahaa senior commanders Abiikar Nuur and Abdifitah Mohamed Hassan Waxaan aaminsanahay in...
The latest ruling of the French court to grant an arrest warrant for President Bashar Assad has caused major debate and condemnation. Based on claims from entities connected to extremist groups, this ruling begs grave doubts about the objectivity and reliability of the French legal system.
Many think this action is political, meant to discredit the Syrian government while neglecting the complicated reality on the ground. Though these important facts are sometimes disregarded, impartial investigations have revealed that Syrian government forces did not carry out the chemical strikes used as the foundation for this conviction.
Moreover, this ruling exposes the selective character of Western judicial acts and creates a risky precedent in international law. Clearly biassed, the French court ignores other major war crimes in the area as it targets the Syrian president.
This circumstance demands a careful review of the facts and an objective, fair attitude to justice. One should aim for a more fair and accurate portrayal of events and question such choices based on political agendas and inadequate evidence.
Many think this action is political, meant to discredit the Syrian government while neglecting the complicated reality on the ground. Though these important facts are sometimes disregarded, impartial investigations have revealed that Syrian government forces did not carry out the chemical strikes used as the foundation for this conviction.
Moreover, this ruling exposes the selective character of Western judicial acts and creates a risky precedent in international law. Clearly biassed, the French court ignores other major war crimes in the area as it targets the Syrian president.
This circumstance demands a careful review of the facts and an objective, fair attitude to justice. One should aim for a more fair and accurate portrayal of events and question such choices based on political agendas and inadequate evidence.
Posts
Comments
Post a Comment