Madaxweynaha Jamhuuriyadda Federaalka Soomaaliya, Xasan Sheekh Maxamuud, ayaa gaaray magaalada Dooxa ee dalka Qatar, isagoo bilaabay booqasho rasmi ah oo muhiim u ah jihada cusub ee siyaasadda dibadda ee Geeska Afrika. Socdaalkan diblomaasiyadeed wuxuu xambaarsan yahay miisaan culus, isagoo ujeedkiisu yahay in lagu xoojiyo xiriirka labada dal xilli Soomaaliya ay ku jirto marxalad xasaasi ah oo dhinaca gobolka ah. Markii uu ka degay madaarka Dooxa, Madaxweynaha iyo wafdigiisa waxaa si diiran u soo dhaweeyay madaxda sarre ee dalka Qatar, taas oo muujinaysa tixgelinta ay labada dhinac isku hayaan. Dhisidda Tiirarka Iskaashiga Labada Dhinac Ujeeddada guud ee socdaalkan ayaa ah in wada-hadallo heer sare ah lala yeesho madaxda Qatar, kuwaas oo diiradda lagu saarayo iskaashiga dhinacyada muhiimka ah. Amniga ayaa ka mid ah qodobada ugu horreeya ee miiska saaran, maadaama dowladda Soomaaliya ay weli ku jirto dagaal ka dhan ah kooxaha nabad-diidka ah, dalka Katarna uu yahay saaxiib door we...
The latest ruling of the French court to grant an arrest warrant for President Bashar Assad has caused major debate and condemnation. Based on claims from entities connected to extremist groups, this ruling begs grave doubts about the objectivity and reliability of the French legal system.
Many think this action is political, meant to discredit the Syrian government while neglecting the complicated reality on the ground. Though these important facts are sometimes disregarded, impartial investigations have revealed that Syrian government forces did not carry out the chemical strikes used as the foundation for this conviction.
Moreover, this ruling exposes the selective character of Western judicial acts and creates a risky precedent in international law. Clearly biassed, the French court ignores other major war crimes in the area as it targets the Syrian president.
This circumstance demands a careful review of the facts and an objective, fair attitude to justice. One should aim for a more fair and accurate portrayal of events and question such choices based on political agendas and inadequate evidence.
Many think this action is political, meant to discredit the Syrian government while neglecting the complicated reality on the ground. Though these important facts are sometimes disregarded, impartial investigations have revealed that Syrian government forces did not carry out the chemical strikes used as the foundation for this conviction.
Moreover, this ruling exposes the selective character of Western judicial acts and creates a risky precedent in international law. Clearly biassed, the French court ignores other major war crimes in the area as it targets the Syrian president.
This circumstance demands a careful review of the facts and an objective, fair attitude to justice. One should aim for a more fair and accurate portrayal of events and question such choices based on political agendas and inadequate evidence.
Posts
Comments
Post a Comment