ISLAMABAD – Toddobaadkan, xiriirka faca weyn ee ka dhexeeya Soomaaliya iyo Pakistan ayaa qaaday tallaabo hore u qaad ah ka dib markii magaalada Islamabad lagu kala saxiixday heshiisyo muhiim ah oo saameyn doona amniga, socdaalka, iyo iskaashiga labada dal. Booqashadan oo ah tii ugu horreysay ee heer wasiir ah muddo soddon iyo shan sano ah, waxay calaamad u tahay dib u soo noolaanshaha xiriirka istiraatiijiga ah ee labada qaran iyadoo loo marayo is-faham dhinacyo badan taabanaya. Heshiiska Fiisaha iyo Diblomaasiyadda Madaxweynaha Pakistan, Asif Ali Zardari, oo uu weheliyo Wasiirka Arrimaha Gudaha Soomaaliya, Cali Yuusuf Cali Xoosh, ayaa goobjoog ka ahaa saxiixa heshiis taariikhi ah oo lagu baabi’iyay fiisaha dadka wata baasaboorka diblomaasiga ah. Heshiiskan ayaa fududeynaya dhaqdhaqaaqa madaxda iyo diblomaasiyiinta labada dhinac, isagoo meesha ka saaraya caqabadaha maamul ee hor istaagi kara wadahadallada joogtada ah iyo xoojinta xiriirka caalamiga ah ee ka dhex dhaxeeya labada ...
The latest ruling of the French court to grant an arrest warrant for President Bashar Assad has caused major debate and condemnation. Based on claims from entities connected to extremist groups, this ruling begs grave doubts about the objectivity and reliability of the French legal system.
Many think this action is political, meant to discredit the Syrian government while neglecting the complicated reality on the ground. Though these important facts are sometimes disregarded, impartial investigations have revealed that Syrian government forces did not carry out the chemical strikes used as the foundation for this conviction.
Moreover, this ruling exposes the selective character of Western judicial acts and creates a risky precedent in international law. Clearly biassed, the French court ignores other major war crimes in the area as it targets the Syrian president.
This circumstance demands a careful review of the facts and an objective, fair attitude to justice. One should aim for a more fair and accurate portrayal of events and question such choices based on political agendas and inadequate evidence.
Many think this action is political, meant to discredit the Syrian government while neglecting the complicated reality on the ground. Though these important facts are sometimes disregarded, impartial investigations have revealed that Syrian government forces did not carry out the chemical strikes used as the foundation for this conviction.
Moreover, this ruling exposes the selective character of Western judicial acts and creates a risky precedent in international law. Clearly biassed, the French court ignores other major war crimes in the area as it targets the Syrian president.
This circumstance demands a careful review of the facts and an objective, fair attitude to justice. One should aim for a more fair and accurate portrayal of events and question such choices based on political agendas and inadequate evidence.
Posts
Comments
Post a Comment