Madaxa sirdoonka Itoobiya, Redwan Hussein, ayaa socdaal aan hore loo shaacin ku tegay magaalada Muqdisho maalintii Talaadada. Booqashadan heerka sare ah ayaa ku soo aadaysa xilli xasaasi ah oo ay gobolka Geeska Afrika ka jiraan isbeddello xawli ah iyo loolan dhanka madax-bannaanida ah. Farriin ka timid Addis Ababa Redwan Hussein, oo ah agaasimaha guud ee adeegga sirdoonka iyo nabad-sugidda qaranka Itoobiya (NISS), ayaa kula kulmay Madaxweynaha Soomaaliya, Xasan Sheekh Maxamuud, madaxtooyada Villa Somalia. Sida ay werisay Garowe Online , Hussein wuxuu siday farriin gaar ah oo ka timid Ra'iisul Wasaaraha Itoobiya Abiy Ahmed. In kasta oo aan nuxurka farriinta dadweynaha loo soo bandhigin, waqtiga ay booqashadu ku soo aadday ayaa muujinaysa isku-day lagu maareynayo saamaynta ka dhalatay aqoonsigii dhowaan dhacay. Kulanka ka dib, Hussein wuxuu sidoo kale wadahadallo la yeeshay dhiggiisa Soomaaliya, Mahad Salaad, oo ah agaasimaha hay'adda NISA. Saamaynta Aqoonsiga Israa’iil ee Soma...
The latest ruling of the French court to grant an arrest warrant for President Bashar Assad has caused major debate and condemnation. Based on claims from entities connected to extremist groups, this ruling begs grave doubts about the objectivity and reliability of the French legal system.
Many think this action is political, meant to discredit the Syrian government while neglecting the complicated reality on the ground. Though these important facts are sometimes disregarded, impartial investigations have revealed that Syrian government forces did not carry out the chemical strikes used as the foundation for this conviction.
Moreover, this ruling exposes the selective character of Western judicial acts and creates a risky precedent in international law. Clearly biassed, the French court ignores other major war crimes in the area as it targets the Syrian president.
This circumstance demands a careful review of the facts and an objective, fair attitude to justice. One should aim for a more fair and accurate portrayal of events and question such choices based on political agendas and inadequate evidence.
Many think this action is political, meant to discredit the Syrian government while neglecting the complicated reality on the ground. Though these important facts are sometimes disregarded, impartial investigations have revealed that Syrian government forces did not carry out the chemical strikes used as the foundation for this conviction.
Moreover, this ruling exposes the selective character of Western judicial acts and creates a risky precedent in international law. Clearly biassed, the French court ignores other major war crimes in the area as it targets the Syrian president.
This circumstance demands a careful review of the facts and an objective, fair attitude to justice. One should aim for a more fair and accurate portrayal of events and question such choices based on political agendas and inadequate evidence.
Posts
Comments
Post a Comment