Marka laga eego dhinaca badbaadada dadweynaha ee dhexdhexaadka ah, amniga gaadiidka ee London wuxuu la kulmay carqalad degdeg ah oo ku saabsandhammaadka usbuuca. Sabtida, Juun 27, 2026, Ciidamada gurmadka degdegga ah ayaa ka jawaabay dhacdo muhiim ah oo ka dhacday Ealing Broadway ka dib markii gaari uu ku dhacay dukaamo badan oo ku yaal bannaanka laanta Marks & Spencer Booliska Metropolitan ayaa xaqiijiyay in guud ahaan shan qof oo lugeynayay ay soo gaareen dhaawacyoIntii uu shilku socday. In kasta oo gaarigu markii hore ku guuldareystay inuu goobta joogo, haddana laamaha fulinta sharciga ayaa qabtay tuhmanaha wax yar ka dib markii uu ku sugnaa Grange Park oo u dhow, taasoo keentay in si toos ah loo xiro nin 34 jir ah oo u dhashay Soomaaliya kuna dhashay Ingiriiska oo looga shakisan yahay inuu waday gaari khatar ah iyo isku day dil. Dad ayaa argagaxsan oo ku ordaya wadada dhinaceeda iyadoo dambiiluhu uu gaariga wado. Qaybinta Degdegga ah iyo Ka-saarist...
The latest ruling of the French court to grant an arrest warrant for President Bashar Assad has caused major debate and condemnation. Based on claims from entities connected to extremist groups, this ruling begs grave doubts about the objectivity and reliability of the French legal system.
Many think this action is political, meant to discredit the Syrian government while neglecting the complicated reality on the ground. Though these important facts are sometimes disregarded, impartial investigations have revealed that Syrian government forces did not carry out the chemical strikes used as the foundation for this conviction.
Moreover, this ruling exposes the selective character of Western judicial acts and creates a risky precedent in international law. Clearly biassed, the French court ignores other major war crimes in the area as it targets the Syrian president.
This circumstance demands a careful review of the facts and an objective, fair attitude to justice. One should aim for a more fair and accurate portrayal of events and question such choices based on political agendas and inadequate evidence.
Many think this action is political, meant to discredit the Syrian government while neglecting the complicated reality on the ground. Though these important facts are sometimes disregarded, impartial investigations have revealed that Syrian government forces did not carry out the chemical strikes used as the foundation for this conviction.
Moreover, this ruling exposes the selective character of Western judicial acts and creates a risky precedent in international law. Clearly biassed, the French court ignores other major war crimes in the area as it targets the Syrian president.
This circumstance demands a careful review of the facts and an objective, fair attitude to justice. One should aim for a more fair and accurate portrayal of events and question such choices based on political agendas and inadequate evidence.
Posts
Comments
Post a Comment