Laga bilaabo 10-ka Maarso, 2026 , Soomaaliya waxay qarka u saaran tahay burbur xooggan oo dhanka dastuurka ah. Inkasta oo Madaxweyne Xasan Sheekh Maxamuud iyo Baarlamaanka Federaalka ay u dabbaal-degayaan ansixinta isbeddellada dastuuriga ah, kuwaas oo dalka u rogaya nidaamka doorashada qof iyo codka ah, haddaba waxaa jira qodob xasaasi ah oo hoosta laga xariiqay. Dimuqraadiyad mise is-mari-waa? Dabbaal-deg iyo dhibaato. Maxaa loogu tilmaamay muddo kororsiga "Awood-maroorsi"? Wax-ka-beddelka dastuurka ee lagu ansixiyay sacaafadda (cod gacantaag ah) 5-tii Maarso , wu...
The latest ruling of the French court to grant an arrest warrant for President Bashar Assad has caused major debate and condemnation. Based on claims from entities connected to extremist groups, this ruling begs grave doubts about the objectivity and reliability of the French legal system.
Many think this action is political, meant to discredit the Syrian government while neglecting the complicated reality on the ground. Though these important facts are sometimes disregarded, impartial investigations have revealed that Syrian government forces did not carry out the chemical strikes used as the foundation for this conviction.
Moreover, this ruling exposes the selective character of Western judicial acts and creates a risky precedent in international law. Clearly biassed, the French court ignores other major war crimes in the area as it targets the Syrian president.
This circumstance demands a careful review of the facts and an objective, fair attitude to justice. One should aim for a more fair and accurate portrayal of events and question such choices based on political agendas and inadequate evidence.
Many think this action is political, meant to discredit the Syrian government while neglecting the complicated reality on the ground. Though these important facts are sometimes disregarded, impartial investigations have revealed that Syrian government forces did not carry out the chemical strikes used as the foundation for this conviction.
Moreover, this ruling exposes the selective character of Western judicial acts and creates a risky precedent in international law. Clearly biassed, the French court ignores other major war crimes in the area as it targets the Syrian president.
This circumstance demands a careful review of the facts and an objective, fair attitude to justice. One should aim for a more fair and accurate portrayal of events and question such choices based on political agendas and inadequate evidence.
Posts
Comments
Post a Comment