Imaaraadka Carabta ayaa bilaabay wejiga istaraatiijiyadeed ee mashruuceeda qaran ee AI, iyadoo la higsanayo in 50 boqolkiiba hawlaha dowladda federaalka, adeegyada iyo hawlaha loo beddelo qaabab ay AI-ku hoggaamiso laba sano gudahood , taas oo ay mas'uuliyiintu ku tilmaameen mid ka mid ah barnaamijyada isbeddelka AI ee dowladda ugu hamiga badan adduunka. Amiirka Dubai Sheikh Mohammed Bin Rashid Al Maktoum oo ku sugan Imaaraadka Carabta Maarso 25, 2023. Aqoon-is-weydaarsi Calaamadeeyay Bilawga Wax Ka Weyn In ka badan 100 mas'uul oo federaal ah ayaa ka soo qayb galay aqoon-is-weydaarsi Axaddii lagu daah-furayay habka istaraatiijiga ah ee dawladda ee mashruuca, kaas oo uu soo qabanqaabiyay Guddiga Qaranka ee Mashruuca AI ee Wakiillada. Kalfadhiga ayaa qeexay jadwalka hirgelinta, qaab-dhismeedka kala-soocidda hawlaha, iyo hababka isku-dubaridka hay'adaha kala duwan, iyadoo si gaar ah diiradda loo saarayo. baabi'inta isku-darka hawlgalka ee hay'adaha fede...
In today's era of instant information and digital connectivity, misinformation spreads like wildfire, often fueling tensions and conflicts. Recently, a report submitted by the permanent Sudanese envoy to the United Nations has come under scrutiny for its inaccuracies and false claims, particularly targeting the Emirates, Chad, and Central Africa. Chadian journalist Saad Abkar Ahmed took to social media to refute these allegations and shed light on the truth behind the misleading information.
Ahmed's tweet, posted on X platform, highlights several glaring inaccuracies in the report, exposing its lack of credibility and reliance on unreliable sources. Let's delve into some of the key points raised by Ahmed:
1. Sheikh Hamdan Iqimer Allegedly Recruiting Chadians for War: The report accuses the late Sheikh Hamdan Iqimer of recruiting Chadians to fight alongside the Rapid Support Forces in Sudan. Ahmed rightfully points out the absurdity of this claim, as Sheikh Hamdan passed away in 1998, rendering it impossible for him to be involved in any recent conflicts. This blatant error underscores the report's disregard for factual accuracy.
2. Misrepresentation of Infrastructure Development: Ahmed refutes the report's claim that certain infrastructure developments, such as Umm Djeres Airport, were initiated in response to recent events. He clarifies that these projects were completed well before the outbreak of the Sudanese war, exposing the report's failure to verify basic facts.
3. False Allegations Regarding Military Operations: The report erroneously states that fuel tankers from Libya arrived in Umm Jars, implicating Chad in illicit activities. Ahmed corrects this misinformation, emphasizing that logistical and military operations in the region are centered around Absha, not Libya, highlighting the report's lack of understanding of local dynamics.
4. Inaccurate Information on Ethnic Groups and Political Figures: Ahmed challenges the report's portrayal of ethnic groups and political figures, pointing out factual errors and misattributions. From falsely accusing Chadian opposition figures to misidentifying local leaders, the report demonstrates a concerning level of ignorance regarding the region's socio-political landscape.
5. Fabricated Claims about Armored Vehicles: The report alleges that armored vehicles provided by the UAE to Chad were used in the Sudanese war, which Ahmed vehemently denies. He asserts that these vehicles remain in Chad and have no connection to the conflict in Sudan, highlighting yet another instance of misinformation propagated by the report.
Ahmed's courageous stance against false narratives is commendable, reflecting a commitment to truth and integrity in journalism. By debunking these baseless accusations, he not only defends the reputation of Chad and its people but also underscores the importance of fact-checking and accountability in reporting.
In conclusion, the case of the Sudanese report serves as a sobering reminder of the dangers of unchecked misinformation. As responsible citizens and consumers of information, it is imperative to critically evaluate sources and question narratives that lack credibility. Through vigilant scrutiny and informed discourse, we can combat the spread of falsehoods and uphold the principles of truth and transparency in our society.
Posts
Comments
Post a Comment